<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stressful testing&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://testingblues.com/index.php/archives/2008/02/stressful-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://testingblues.com/index.php/archives/2008/02/stressful-testing/</link>
	<description>Test is the new Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 19:17:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Tilt</title>
		<link>http://testingblues.com/index.php/archives/2008/02/stressful-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Tilt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingblues.com/index.php/archives/2008/02/stressful-testing/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Good reuse Ben :)
Stress is probably the most misunderstood area of system test. Most people talk about stress when they mean load.  For me stress is going beyond the acceptable limits of the product, but with the assumption that failure will be graceful (if not deterministic). 
I also think we over-stress our products. To extend your (our?) example a typical stress test would be to drive to John O&#039;Groats, at 120mph with 7 people on board. Of course the car is going to break, but is it really going to help improve the product? Likewise, attacking the same car with a sledgehammer is going to break it, but is that useful information? If we are going to do stress testing we must ensure that all the tests are seeking to add value to the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good reuse Ben <img src='http://testingblues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Stress is probably the most misunderstood area of system test. Most people talk about stress when they mean load.  For me stress is going beyond the acceptable limits of the product, but with the assumption that failure will be graceful (if not deterministic).<br />
I also think we over-stress our products. To extend your (our?) example a typical stress test would be to drive to John O&#8217;Groats, at 120mph with 7 people on board. Of course the car is going to break, but is it really going to help improve the product? Likewise, attacking the same car with a sledgehammer is going to break it, but is that useful information? If we are going to do stress testing we must ensure that all the tests are seeking to add value to the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

