<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Off piste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://testingblues.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/off-piste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://testingblues.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/off-piste/</link>
	<description>Test is the new Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:40:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Tilt</title>
		<link>http://testingblues.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/off-piste/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Tilt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingblues.com/?p=98#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Good thoughts Scott - not off skiing are you? :)

I think if you look at this in an agile way then you accept that you can&#039;t know everything up front and create your test plan to cover what you know, but allow for change.
The &#039;off piste&#039; testing allows a bit of exploration and should be used to sanity check your test plan decisions. If it exposes a problematic area then great - adapt the plan to cope with it.
You could call &#039;off piste&#039; &#039;testing or verifying the test plan&#039;. If it doesn&#039;t find anything then your test plan was good. If it does, enhance the plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts Scott &#8211; not off skiing are you? <img src='http://testingblues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think if you look at this in an agile way then you accept that you can&#8217;t know everything up front and create your test plan to cover what you know, but allow for change.<br />
The &#8216;off piste&#8217; testing allows a bit of exploration and should be used to sanity check your test plan decisions. If it exposes a problematic area then great &#8211; adapt the plan to cope with it.<br />
You could call &#8216;off piste&#8217; &#8216;testing or verifying the test plan&#8217;. If it doesn&#8217;t find anything then your test plan was good. If it does, enhance the plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

